home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- On Tue, 16 Jan 1996, Magnus Kollberg wrote:
-
- > BTW. I did an simple test with a smaller view on my VGA. I used the 160x200
- > resolution but not the real one, I just changed the viewport to 160x200,
- > not the "real" resolution. I don't know if this can be compared to a "real"
- > res. change but not to far I think. Anyhow, it were indeed faster. I tried it on
- > the 030 version (no DSP) and running in 160x200 insteed of 320x200 gave an
- > speed increase between 50-70% and it were even 5-10% faster than the DSP version.
- > Not too bad I think. :-) It looks like this turbo mode can boost BM to some nice
- > levels. :-)
-
- Using 160 in stretched mode is a bit slower than decreasing the screen
- sice, since you have to update 4 bytes instead of 2 each pixel.
-
- --
- Elias Martenson
- elias@omicron.se
-
-